Sat 17 May 2008

RSS Feed

Edited by Paul Hales

Published by Incisive Media Investments Ltd.

Terms and Conditions of use.

To advertise in Europe e-mail here

To advertise in Asia email here.

To advertise in North America email here.

Join the INQbot Mail List for a weekly guide to our news stories:

Subscribe

Asus Eee gets Atomized

IDF Spring 2008 Same old all new crotchtop

WHAT IS THE next step for the Eee? Easy, Atomize it.

As any fool can see, the smash hit Eee crotchtop with an Atom CPU looks, well, exactly the same as the older model.

Same shell, new guts

It should have a lot better battery life, a bit more CPU power, and cost more. The end result, a much more attractive version of an already attractive product. µ

Comments

UMPCs and Atom

I think Intel's pretty lucky that the EEE PC came out when it did, and that it's shown that an (almost) UMPC can be successful. Before the EEE we've seen lots of really nice looking UMPCs like the Sony's and the OQO's and others, where the pundits were impressed but real sales were pretty pathetic.

It's not like the current iteration of the Atom family has too many other market segments it can compete in anyway, its power usage is still too high to take on the entrenched ARM crowd where the big volume lies.

The article says that the Atom based UMPC will likely cost more than the existing Celeron version, but doesn't the top Atom package at $160 cost the same as the old EEE PCs 933 MHz ULV Celeron, with the Atom price including the chipset as well?
posted by : Bryn Thomas, 06 April 2008

That's an Eee701

You took a picture of the EeePC 701 at the Netbook booth, didn't you... did you notice that all the other systems had an "Atom" sticker, but this one didn't? It seems that Asus couldn't get an EeePC 900 to IDF, and so Intel showed off the old one... oops.
posted by : Dirk, 07 April 2008

"Cost more"?

I don't like this game...
posted by : Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 08 January 2008

pathetic Sony sales, I wonder why

--[Before the EEE we've seen lots of really nice looking UMPCs like the Sony's and the OQO's and others, where the pundits were impressed but real sales were pretty pathetic.]--

That's probably because Sony's attempts at ultra-mobile devices all cost about 15 billion dollars.
posted by : Stephen Brooks, 09 April 2008
IThound
Search for solutions, reports & analysis

Newsletter signup